Simon Accuses Porsha of Abandoning Georgia Mansion

Last month returning Real Housewives of Atlanta cast member Porsha Williams accused her estranged husband, Nigerian businessman Simon Goubadia, of changing the locks on their Georgia mansion and refusing to vacate the premises within 30 days of her divorce filing, in compliance with their prenuptial agreement [click here if you missed that]. 

Simon accuses Porsha of abandoning the mansion, and the marriage, and only returning after filing an emergency motion to put him out... 

From Radar Online

Porsha Williams' estranged husband is fighting her request for exclusive access to their marital mansion after she accused him of changing the locks when she filed for divorce. In documents exclusively obtained by RadarOnline.com, Simon Guobadia denied "removing" his ex from the home, arguing that he purchased it using his own money before their marriage while adding The Real Housewives of Atlanta star has a separate $1.8 million nearby that she can live in.

Simon said he's been "the sole payor of the purchase and expenses" on the mansion since buying it on November 8, 2021, over a year before they said, "I do." While he admitted that she moved into the property before they wed, Simon charged this "is the only home he has in the United States."

Simon informed the court that he's remained in the marital house with his children during the divorce, adding that Porsha has "since moved back into the Marital Residence" since filing for an emergency hearing.

In the documents filed on Wednesday in Fulton County court, he argued that Porsha "has the option to live comfortably in her $1.8M dollar home located in Gwinnett County, Georgia where she has been the sole owner since 2016." Despite Porsha's claim, Simon further argued that she and her daughter "were never displaced."

Simon claimed Porsha "unexpectedly abandoned" their home after she filed for divorce, accusing her of doing so "without any prior discussions with Husband and without any regard or care for the house or Husband’s children." He charged that "as a result of Wife’s abandonment, arrangements had to be made for the care of Husband’s children as Husband had traveled for work."

The businessman also argued that the judge has yet to rule that their prenup is valid — thus, he should be able to stay in the home he purchased.