After The Real Housewives of Atlanta cast member Porsha Williams won the right to film inside the Georgia mansion belonging to her ex husband, Simon Guobadia, Simon vowed to keep up the fight [click here if you missed that].
Now Porsha is accusing Simon of abusive and retaliatory litigation...
From In Touch
Real Housewives of Atlanta star Porsha Williams slammed her estranged husband, Simon Guobadia, for allegedly attempting to hinder her “ability to sustain her livelihood and career,” In Touch can exclusively report.
Porsha, 43, filed a response to Simon’s recent motion demanding the court vacate an order allowing her to film RHOA inside the $7 million mansion they once shared.
Porsha's lawyer, Randall Kessler, argued, “The court’s Order Permitting Filming in the Marital Residence is both just and equitable under the circumstances. Preventing Wife from filming her day-to-day activities and lifestyle in the marital residence, over which she has exclusive possession, use and occupancy, is neither reasonable nor fair.”
“Such a restriction would unjustly hinder Wife’s ability to sustain her livelihood and career, which are intrinsically tied to her public persona and professional obligations,” Porsha’s lawyer added.
Porsha and her attorney called out Simon for his alleged “abusive litigation.”
Randall wrote, “Since Wife’s initiation of the instant divorce matter and insistence on the enforcement of the Prenuptial Agreement, Husband has engaged in a campaign of bad-faith and abusive litigation all targeted at retaliating against Wife with the goal of intentionally restricting her ability to earn a living, expand her career and establish independence from Husband.”
Porsha's lawyer continued, “Husband’s retaliatory motives are evidenced by the fact that both of the parties’ participated in reality TV, prior to and during the marriage, including numerous instances where filming took place inside the marital residence.”
Porsha accused Simon of “consistently” seeking to delay and prolong the divorce, “further demonstrating his abusive approach to the legal process.”
Her lawyer ended, “Husband’s instant Motion to Vacate Order Permitting Filming in Marital Residence is yet another attempt to perpetuate this campaign of obstruction and harassment. By granting Wife the right to film in the residence she occupies, the Court has maintained a balanced and equitable approach, ensuring that Wife’s ability to provide for herself and move forward independently is not unduly compromised by Husband’s continued interference.”
A judge has yet to rule.
No comments:
Post a Comment