Donovan also revealed that the REAL reason Geffen ended their two year marriage is because he requested a post-nuptial agreement...
From The Daily Mail
Billionaire mogul David Geffen has rubbished his estranged boytoy husband's explosive claims that he's a six and drug-crazed abuser.
Geffen, 82, branded 32 year-old Donovan Michaels' divorce filing allegations 'false and pathetic'.
Donovan Michaels, 32, alleges that his billionaire beau Geffen, 82, forced him to take drugs, subjected him to abusive six and controlled his every move, according to the latest lawsuit in their messy divorce battle.
The most jaw-dropping part of the suit alleged that Geffen forced Michaels to have all his body hair lasered off and that he'd once flown into a rage at the sight of an ingrown hair.
The pair met in 2016 on SeekingArrangements.com, a dating website often used by rich people looking for younger partners.
Geffen, a movie and music producer worth about $9 billion, allegedly paid Michaels $10,000 for six on the night they met, according to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court.
The pair would go on to form a relationship and ultimately married in 2023 without a prenup, according to the complaint.
In May of this year, Geffen filed for divorce, citing irreconcilable differences as the reason for the split, according to a petition seen by Daily Mail.
Michaels' lawsuit claims that Geffen did this because after years of being 'a prop in Geffen's theater of virtue,' Michaels finally approached his husband and asked to renegotiate the terms of their union.
He 'wanted a new beginning wherein he could stand shoulder to shoulder with Geffen as an equal free from power dynamics that existed,' the suit said.
Michaels claimed that Geffen rejected this, cut him off financially and immediately demanded a divorce.
Michaels is suing Geffen for breach of contract, alleging that he promised to take care of him financially but left him near broke and without a home.
Geffen's attorney Patty Glaser hit back at the allegations, denying them completely.
'There was no contract — express, written, oral, or implied — that has ever existed,' she said in a statement to Daily Mail. 'We will be vigorously and righteously defending against this false, pathetic lawsuit.'
 

 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment